On 03/29/2014 04:43 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Richard Heck schreef op 28-3-2014 16:53:
I think this one that you had earlier:
new -> fixed in master -> fixed in master and stable -> closed(fixed)
new -> fixed in stable -> closed(fixed)
new -> fixed in stable -> fixed in master and stable -> closed(fixed)
new -> fixed in master -> closed(fixed)
is complicated enough. The difference between "stable-only" and
"master-only" can be indicated differently.
First, if a bug is master-only and is fixedinmaster, then it can be
closed. The bug was only ever in the development branch, and was
never released. This is current policy.
If the fix for a bug involves a file-format change, it can only be
fixed in master. This doesn't mean that the bug was never released.
Yes, that's true.
The problem with the above scheme is that the percentage at the
roadmap is wrong for either the stable branch or for master.
OK.
rh
