Am Mittwoch, 26. März 2014 um 18:11:41, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> > 26/03/2014 16:24, Pavel Sanda: > >> I the __attribute((unused)) portable in general? > >> > >> Why not use the return value to output a lyxerr warning if needed? > > > > That was my first idea. But we no more have filename in our hands so most > > we can output > > is something like "can't unlock file". You prefer this? > > Well, at least we will know that this triggers and maybe take a look at > it. Is it a problem when locking does not succeed?
It's un-locking here. And no problem.
The locking came in because we are testing more than 1 lyx-instance in parallel.
It may start to be a problem, if the routine should lock also against threads.
> JMarc
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
