Re: Goto inset patch

[Dekel Tsur]

On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 05:56:50PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Dekel> Should I also replace error-next, error-note and reference-next
> Dekel> lyxfuncs by a general inset-next lyxfunc ?
> 
> Something like "inset-next error"? I'm not sure it will be more
> general, just different.

Are there any objections to this change ? (it will break user defined bindings
but that is not a big problem).