Am 10.03.2014 um 21:47 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn <v...@lyx.org>:
> Georg Baum schreef op 3-3-2014 22:28: >> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >> >>> The status now is that we can release 2.1 as soon as the Mac Cocoa >>> problems listed in #8959 are resolved: >>> >>> I think we should aim at a release in March. Do a RC in mid March, and >>> then release two weeks later, if no urgent problems are reported. >> Thanks for the update, Jürgen, I agree. Uwe, are you finished with the >> documentation until then? IMHO it would be OK if the major changes are >> done. Some finetuning, or some minor new feature documentation could follow >> in a minor release. > > I agree with you. IMO, the critical bugs left in the bug tracker are > difficult to fix, and have been around for a long time. > > Is it correct that the MacOS problems are now all solved except for some > cosmetic issues ? I don't know. Currently it's not clear. The package I've build is usable on Benjamin's 10.9 and it's not usable on the machine of the OP of ticket 8925. That's very strange. > Stefan, are you ok with release a version with Qt4 given that LyX 2.2. will > be here much faster than LyX 2.1 came after LyX 2.0 ? Yes, we should do a 2.1 release with 4.8.x. (4.8.4 or 4.8.5) We have to provide more than one package for different Mac OS versions. The package build on 10.8 doesn't run on 10.5 and I had problems with the package build on 10.6 (works on 10.5 too) on higher OS versions. Stephan > I'm now confused on the status on Windows. For me it looks rather ok. > > Things to be fixed IMO: > - the master-child bug caused by used the master's BufferParams, > > Last thing, do you still want me to do the final release ? I really want to > get it out as soon as possible. > > Vincent >
