Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > * giving the LFUN_ACCENT_ACUTE name is totally pointless: users do not > > understand it and developers know how to read accent-acute anyway. The > > file would be much les intimidating with the real names. > > The real names are not really accessible from the doxygen comments (we have > "Syntax", but that includes options and params).
But of course we can try to strip them from the "Syntax" item. > > * can we use the FuncType enum to classify the functions into several > > sections? > > I doubt this is possible with the script (which does basically just parse > the doxygen comments). Of course we could extend that comments. What I would propose, however, is to add some initial paragraph to this manual that explains what lfuns are and how to use them. Regards, Jürgen
