On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta <tomm...@lyx.org> wrote: > On 27/11/13 19:25, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>>> findadv-re-05-in.txt: FAILED >>>> findadv-re-06-in.txt: Ok >>>> >> Tommaso, is this test failure a regression or a bug in the test? Is it >> on your radar to fix? Should the test be removed? > > AFAICR, it a case working after a patch fixing another case, and unfortunately > it didn't seem to be easy to fix both of them. But not sure I'm remembering > well, need to check when I have time (I'm on travel for the next 2 weeks :-( > ). >
Thanks for responding, Tommaso. Enjoy your vacation! (only read the following when you get back) I think you are thinking of this: http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg180067.html (which reverted the implementation of the enhancement request discussed here: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/145447 ). So if the problematic commit was reverted then it should not be the cause of this failure. I would normally do a bisect but I don't think it would be linear (I've had the tests go from failing to passing to failing) so it would be tricky. Scott
