On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 09:15 +0000, LyX Ticket Tracker wrote:
> #8577: Additional features manual
> ---------------------------+------------------------
>  Reporter:  john_hudson    |       Owner:  uwestoehr
>      Type:  task           |      Status:  new
>  Priority:  normal         |   Milestone:  2.1.0
> Component:  documentation  |     Version:  2.1.0svn
>  Severity:  normal         |  Resolution:
>  Keywords:                 |
> ---------------------------+------------------------
> 
> Comment (by spitz):
> 
>  Replying to [comment:4 spitz]:
>  
>  Actually, I think loading the Lilypond module in this document is a bad
>  idea, since it will annoy everybody who hasn't lilypond installed (which I
>  assume are many). Rather than that, I would just refer to Help >
>  Additional Manuals > LilyPond.

Fine
>  
>  The whole section about multiple columns need to be copied from the recent
>  version in trunk.
It was at the time (Scott kindly sent it to me) - but there may have
been revisions since then.
> 
>  > In undertaking the restructuring, I started from the philosophy set out
>  > in Chapter 1 and restructured the manual around the order of topics in
>  > the User's Guide. I have also copied some parts of the User's Guide
>  > directly into the manual on the assumption that, if these changes are
>  > acceptable, those parts of the User's Guide can be deleted and replaced
>  > by a reference to the Additional Features manual.
> 
>  Which parts are that?
Things like BibTeX that are provided by external programs seemed better
all in the Additional features manual.
> 
>  > One option would be to wait until 2.1 comes out; I could then go through
>  > what I have done and add in anything that has been added to the current
>  > version since I did this one.
> 
>  I would not do that. But you could use the forthcoming 2.1 beta and try to
>  finish the stuff until 2.1 final.
Unfortunately, I have only one machine which is my production machine.
So I don't want to compromise that by installing a beta version.
> 
>  One thing I spotted which needs update are the document class names. The
>  old scheme "genre (class)" is no longer used, since we have proper
>  categories now. So, for instance, "article (koma)" is now called "KOMA
>  Article".
> 
I've noticed a lot of things that have changed since I did the original
work in January. As I cannot access 2.1 files, and assuming no-one else
has the time to do it before 2.1 comes out, that was why I was
suggesting waiting until 2.1 and bringing everything up-to-date then.

John
--


Reply via email to