On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Uwe Stöhr <uwesto...@web.de> wrote: > Am 26.05.2013 05:17, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > >> The differences in the two logs come down to the following (I can post >> full logs if anyone is interested): >> (good) Package: natbib 2010/09/13 8.31b (PWD, AO) >> vs. >> (bad) Package: natbib 2006/03/22 7.3 (PWD) > > > OK, so there might have been a bug in natbib and this is now fixed. But why > does TeXLive 2012 provides an older version than TL 2011?
I was wondering that also. I don't know. Perhaps there is something wrong with my install. I will look into this. What natbib version do you have? >> and >> (good) File: latin1.def 1998/03/05 v0.97 Input encoding file(test >> version: still liabl >> e to change) >> vs. >> (bad) File: latin9.def 2008/03/30 v1.1d Input encoding file > > > I also have latin9.def 2008/03/30 v1.1d but can compile the JASA template. Good to know. So that is probably not the problem. Scott
