Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Do you think it's better to add \hyperlink support to the label inset > or to make a separate, collapsable hypertarget inset? \hypertarget > takes two arguments: the name and the text. The name could be set in > the settings, and the text in the collapsable inset.
I'd prefer not to add too many different insets for similar functions. But the collapsable solution adds some convenience. > How much of the Cross Reference inset should be copied to the hyperref > inset? It seems like all of it, except the "Format" combo box. If we > needed more room, we could also get rid of the filter, sort, etc. > widgets, although they are just as relevant. > > Should labels and hypertargets have two separate tree widgets? No strong opinion on these. > "Link type" will now have four options: Web, Email, File, and the new > one. What should the new one be called? "text"? "hypertarget"? "internal"? Jürgen
