On 14/03/2013 10:00, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 14/03/2013 01:04, Alessandro Di Federico a écrit :
On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 12:36 +0100, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
I did too.. sort of.
It'd be nice to expand a bit the "what are we going to discuss" section.
The most interesting is in general "what are we going to code". This
is not decided in advance in general, although people usually come
with a wish list. For example, a big point for me this year is
word-level text metrics, since our current code causes many problems.
And maybe getting rid of most of our bidi code if we are lucky and qt
can do it all for us. But I am definitely not competent enough on
these subjects, which is why a LDM is the good place to do it.
The best solution is of course to entice somebody more competent (yes,
Abdel I am looking at you!) to do it :)
Not sure I still have the competence... but we can try :-)
Other ideas:
* flat directory structure.
* more core / gui separation
* get rid of the complicated graphics stuff
* replace the pixmap/image backend with QGraphicsView.
* Qt5 compilation and testing
* libgit2 integration
And off course: stabilize devel for 2.1 release.
Abdel.
