On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 01:27:40AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> André Pönitz <andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de> writes:
>
> | On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:14:42PM +0200, lar...@gullik.org wrote:
> >> From: Lars Gullik Bjønnes <lar...@gullik.org>
> >>
> >> Use a local typedef pair<string, string> P to avoid having to repeat
> >> that multiple times.
> >> ---
> >> src/lyxfind.cpp | 72
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> >> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/src/lyxfind.cpp b/src/lyxfind.cpp
> >> index a19724b..33dbd8a 100644
> >> --- a/src/lyxfind.cpp
> >> +++ b/src/lyxfind.cpp
> >> @@ -495,54 +495,62 @@ typedef vector<pair<string, string> > Escapes;
> >> /// @note Beware of order
> >> Escapes const & get_regexp_escapes()
> >> {
> >> + typedef std::pair<std::string, std::string> P;
> >> +
> >
> | Conveniently adding a std:: or three, so next time the discussion
> | comes up we can reasonably claim that it is used "inconsistently"
> | and the 'using' on top could go...
>
> What is your agenda really?
Preventing attempts to turn the LyX code base into a guinea pig for
programming experiments again. Especially the kind of experiment that
add a burden for others.
Andre'
