Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> writes:
| Le 23/10/2012 14:27, Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
>> C++11 would make the code look a lot nicer, esp. thru the use of range
>> based for, and auto:
>>
>> std::vector<string>::iterator at = somevec.begin();
>> std::vector<string>::iterator end = someved.end();
>> for (; at != end; ++at) {
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> would be replaced with:
>>
>> for (auto & s: somevec) {
>> ...
>> }
>
| We already have a foreach macro that is not to bad, but we do not use
| it much:
| foreach (string & s, somevec) {
| ...
| }
>
| This is admittedly not as nice as real C++11, but if we converted code
| to use it, it would be trivial later to switch to the real thing.
>
| Concerning auto, I am still not sure that I like it.
Liking it took me some 5 seconds.
Auto suddenly makes it nice to work with the complex types you get in
C++.
Imagine:
auto func = [](){};
func();
try to figure out what type func really is. Do you care?
--
Lgb
