On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes <lar...@gullik.org> wrote: > Abdelrazak Younes <you...@lyx.org> writes: >>> >>> You mean using std::string everywhere? That does not sound nice. >> > | +1 >> >>> I agree though that using std:: on other less used things is not a bad idea. >> > | Not even that. The style is consistent right now... > > Is it? Or did you mean to write in-consistent?
No I really meant consistent. > | If you let some > | exception to slip in it will be worse at the end. > > if you disallow using namespace std, and do not use "using std::xx" to > drag anything into current namespace you will not get any exceptions. > but if you look now, you will find several std:: used even if "using > namespace std" is in effect in the same file. Then we should remove these std:: instance in cpp files. Cheers, Abdel. PS: This is just peer review Lars, no hostility from my side. My LyX work last couple of years doesn't allow me to veto anything.
