Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>> diff --git a/src/support/shared_ptr.h b/src/support/shared_ptr.h
>> index 69e42da..792beb2 100644
>> --- a/src/support/shared_ptr.h
>> +++ b/src/support/shared_ptr.h
>> @@ -12,22 +12,6 @@
>> #ifndef LYX_SHARED_PTR_H
>> #define LYX_SHARED_PTR_H
>>
>> -#ifdef LYX_USE_TR1
>> -
>> -#include <memory>
>> -
>> -#ifdef __GNUC__
>> -#include <tr1/memory>
>> -#endif
>> -
>> -namespace lyx
>> -{
>> - using std::tr1::shared_ptr;
>> - using std::tr1::const_pointer_cast;
>> -}
>> -
>> -#else
>> -
>
| Didn't we have plans (and actually tried on last meeting) to finally
| drop boost and use TR1 instead?
We should not use TR1. Esp. not now when have got C++11.
(TR1 is not always compatible with C++11).
| Not that I have strong opinion about either direction but this
| looks to me as if we bounce from one corner to the other corner.
I have a followup patch to the one above that will change to using
std::shared_ptr (et.al) when available.
--
Lgb
