Op 15 nov. 2011 03:35 schreef "Richard Heck" <rgh...@comcast.net> het volgende: > > On 11/14/2011 04:36 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> >> Richard Heck wrote: >>> >>> Something like that may be happening. Pavel, can you produce a minimal set >>> just replicating the structure? >> >> confirming that the cause is r39599. >> >> the structure causing warning is: >> parent->child1 >> parent->child2->child1 >> > Weird. I'll have a look, obviously before 2.0.2. I guess we knew these double parent issues could cause problems.... > > rh
Yes, thats why I added the warning. I think I guarded for this as well. Do we clone all children when running asynchronous autosave? We shouldnt. Maybe the guard doesn't function when deleting the cloned buffers. Vincent >
