Concerning the bug, Julien proposes the following trick:
"
- *julien.ri...@gmail.com* added
As a workaround you could have a "fake" math macro at the top of your
document.
Insert a math macro for \Sexpr{} and put a "%" in ERT in front of it. Now
you can use \Sexpr in math."
I have tried to follow it, math macros are part of the mysteries of LyX
that I have never used yet, so it is again a first time. I have read the
help document about the macros in the Math manual (but again, even if I
understand the general principle of the macros, I do not understand their
intricacies) and tried to put a macro that generates the following
instruction in the preamble:
\global\long\def\sagecommand#1{\sage\{#1\}}
(I cannot copy and paste the macro definition...)
But when I put \sagecommand{a-Sage-command} in a displayed equation, i get
??a-Sage-command in the math box, as well as in the compiled pdf... instead
of \sage{a-Sage-command} in the final Latex and the results of the Sage
computation in the PDF.
I am pretty sure that I am doing something stupid...
Moreover, the math-macro seems to have crashed other Sage computations that
results from the sagecommand insets (they generate \sage{} commands in the
latex file) that were working before the introduction of the macro.
Murat
2011/11/3 Liviu Andronic <landronim...@gmail.com>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Murat Yildizoglu <myi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I have waited a little bit before harassing you again with my Sage
> extension
> > problem.
> > Concerning the possibility of including Sage commands in the math mode, I
> > have not found any solution.
> >
> I think you're seeing bug #7181.
>
> Liviu
>
>
> > Is there a Flex-inset type that can be inserted in a math box, without
> being
> > interpreted before the compilation of the document by
> > pdflatex+Sage+pdflatex? When I insert my \sage{} instruction in a math
> > expression, Lyx tries to interpret what is inside, even if I have set the
> > inset as Passtrough=1.
> > I know that I can do it using an ERT but I will have to type the complete
> > expression in the ERt too in this case :-( (well, I know that I could
> type
> > it in a math box and then copy and paste in the ERT, but I cannot use the
> > conveniences of Lyx for displayed equations and equation sets even in
> this
> > case).
> >
> > --
> > Prof. Murat Yildizoglu
> > Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV
> > GREThA (UMR CNRS 5113)
> > Avenue Léon Duguit
> > 33608 Pessac cedex
> > France
> >
> > yi...@u-bordeaux4.fr
> > http://yildizoglu.info
> > http://www.twitter.com/yildizoglu
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Do you know how to read?
> http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
> http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader
> Do you know how to write?
> http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail
>
--
Prof. Murat Yildizoglu
Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV
GREThA (UMR CNRS 5113)
Avenue Léon Duguit
33608 Pessac cedex
France
yi...@u-bordeaux4.fr
h <http://myildi.e-jemed.org/>ttp://yildizoglu.info
http://www.twitter.com/yildizoglu
