Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > BTW I would not add 2.0.0svn, 2.0.1svn etc. for any minor release. This > overcrowds the combo. > In the past, we had one 1.6.0svn for the whole cycle.
I was confused. Of course, 2.0.0svn refers to the major cycle, and 2.0.1svn to the minor cycles. Anyway, 2.0.Xsvn (instead of 2.0.1svn) would be clearer. Jürgen
