On 07/09/2011 5:27 PM, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 11:06:04AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
- std::string const& extension() const { return extension_; }
+ std::string const& extension() const { return extension_list_[0]; }
and extension_list_[0] would be an invalid address otherwise.
return extension_list_.empty() ? "" : extension_list_[0]?
That would return a dangling reference in this particular case.
So either
std::string extension() const
{
return extension_list_.empty() ? "" : extension_list_[0];
}
or the moral equivalent of
std::string const& extension() const
{
static std::string dummy;
return extension_list_.empty() ? dummy : extension_list_[0];
}
Andre'
Thanks, I went with the moral.
Just learning at the moment.
--
Julien