On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn <v...@lyx.org> wrote:
OK - so not as easy as I rememeber - well.. > (i) is certainly fixable, in the sense that we can spawn "git status" and > check the return value, but it is not as easy as looking for .svn, say. > > > We can just copy-paste the code that git uses itself to detect whether it > is in a repo or not ? > > > (ii) is definitely a different issue. > > > it depends on how complex you want to make. You can easily mimick the svn > workflow: push after every commit. Or you can make two options: commit and > push. Not so big deal, right ? > Why not having a simple commit, and leave the push to the user? I really see one maina dvantage of using git in having it local - and when one is online (and has an remote repo - I wouldn't in most cases), push manually. Cheers, Rainer > > Richard > > Vincent > -- Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation Biology, UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany) Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology Stellenbosch University South Africa Tel : +33 - (0)9 53 10 27 44 Cell: +33 - (0)6 85 62 59 98 Fax (F): +33 - (0)9 58 10 27 44 Fax (D): +49 - (0)3 21 21 25 22 44 email: rai...@krugs.de Skype: RMkrug
