On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 03:06:30PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:43:47PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > How portable is this in your opinion? > > It assumes a bourne compatible shell, but that assumption is made > in so many places that I think it's very safe. > > The only problem that I foresee is when one of the minor numbers > in the Qt version is greater than 9. For example, it will fail > for Qt 4.10.0 (in its present form), but it can be complicated > a bit to also account for that.
There won't be a Qt 4.10. Andre'
