On 05/11/2011 02:24 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 02:14:10PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 05/11/2011 02:08 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 01:54:07PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
This way we would have one directory per program or library.
Sorry, but I really don't see the need for a reorganization that will
destabilize things and will cause people to fix problems that would
have never emerged.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:If_it_ain%27t_broke,_don%27t_fix_it
Why are we still developing LyX when it is surely good enough for most user?
Because we have itches to scratch and spare time to do that. If the itch
is not so compelling or there's no spare time...
So your itches is more important than others?
1) I disagree that this will destabilize things except for a day or
maybe two.
2) This will allow us to further clean up and modularize the code.
I'm starting to develop a sort of allergy to some keywords...
Please allow me some kind of minimal intelligence. This is not about
shuffling everything around just for fun. Cleaning up and modularization
of the code are part of the reason why it is easier to implement feature
in LyX now than 5 years ago. You may think that those features are not
useful nor important but some people think otherwise. So I really do
think that LyX source code should be furthered cleaned up in order to
continue to be successful as a project.
I am not interested in continuing this argument.
Abdel.
