> > i would be more happy to get higher number of single commits as the time is > passing rather that getting one set of 20 commits, which will make me just > roughly skim it. > > it also makes other react on some design problems earlier than when someone > comes out of the blue with 10kb series of patches. >
I don't see what my scheme differs from the current scheme. You make a feature and instead of doing it locally, you do it in a branch (possibly online if you want). When you normally would commit it, now you announce the new branch. The fixes you normally would make in svn trunk, you now make in the respective branch and everyone gets noted. As a bonus, when the feature is ready, you will be noted as well. I didn't say anything about waiting for a single commit of 10kb patches. Vincent
