Andre Poenitz wrote: > pushes, like work on X - see that an unrelated two-liner is needed > somewhere, stash, local commit, pop stash, go on with X. This saves so > much time that I have a hard time to see how anybody who has used svn > and git in earnest for a few days would vote svn in this kind of > discussion.
but thats already possible now. we have svn as a nice linear repo while you can use git-svn locally. all the rebase and stash tricks work. until one comes to branches... pavel
