Slightly off-topic..

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn <v...@lyx.org> wrote:
> I'd prefer to continue with the current versioning scheme and introduce
> LyX3.0 when there is a significant change, or when we think LyX has taken
> another step in maturity.
>
In this sense the decision to stick with the 2.0 numbering, instead of
1.7, seems vindicated now. 2.0 is an exciting improvement on 1.x. Now
LyX looks like a document production environment genuinely accessible
to the masses.

My 00.02€. Cheers
Liviu

Reply via email to