Slightly off-topic.. On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn <v...@lyx.org> wrote: > I'd prefer to continue with the current versioning scheme and introduce > LyX3.0 when there is a significant change, or when we think LyX has taken > another step in maturity. > In this sense the decision to stick with the 2.0 numbering, instead of 1.7, seems vindicated now. 2.0 is an exciting improvement on 1.x. Now LyX looks like a document production environment genuinely accessible to the masses.
My 00.02€. Cheers Liviu