On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 11:29:21PM -0500, John Weiss wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 02:38:10PM -0500, Amir Karger wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 11:12:20AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Sat, 11 Nov 2000, R. Lahaye wrote:
> > >
> > > I would like to formally request that a new CVS branch be made for lyxdoc
> > > - probably with "lyxdoc" for the new documentation and "lyxdoc_1.1.5" for
> > > the 1.1.5 stuff, similar to the source code branches, and with the same
> > > user access as now.
> >
> > That sounds like a good branching.
>
> Better yet, why not have a single "lyxdoc" CVS branch and use tags to
> mark completed docs for a given LyX release? You *can* create tags
> other than for branches. You can also delete existing tags,
> permitting you to make those, "Ooops! Forgot to fix this," changes
> while still keeping a "1.1.5" tag.
Because 1.1.5 sticks around for a long while. There may be fix versions and
other things. The docs could possibly change within the 1.1.5 branch while
1.1.6 is being developed, so you really need two concurrent open branches.
-Amir
