Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 11:28:33PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| > I just did some testing on _very_ large paragraphs, and it seems that
| > rope has a lot better memory usage and is faster than vector. This is
| > best noticed when inserting and you insert so much thata the
| > vector/rope needs to allocate more memory. The memory usage is also
| > completely different, at least in the implementaions I am using, up to
| > 10MB in difference after doing some inserts into a _huge_ paragrap.
|
| But in normal use, a paragraph is no more than 2000 chars, and usually
| much less.
| In those sizes, a rope is slower than vector, and uses more memory.
| So I don't see a reason to replace vector by rope.
That was pretty much the conclusion last time I tested rope too. On
another note, we should probably test/check deque too.
Lgb
