In case you guys are interested in reading through the whole, long
discussion on the gsoc channel, the complete log should eventually
made its way to this page:

http://ibot.rikers.org/%23gsoc/

Right now the list stops at yesterday's log, so I guess it's updated once a day.

Cheers,

S.


On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 2:14 PM, stefano franchi
<stefano.fran...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Liviu Andronic <landronim...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn <v...@lyx.org> wrote:
>>> At least, now I can sleep well, knowing I could not have done more.
>>>
>> As frustrating as it is, to me it is still comforting to know that the
>> application was top-notch and exactly as Google expected it to be.
>>
>> For GSoC 2012 we will be using our 2011 application and list of ideas
>> as a backbone. However, I would much prefer that we avoid the
>> seven-days-before-the-deadline rush, so I plan to create a GSoC 2012
>> draft page as soon as this week in which we will invite everyone to
>> submit ideas all year long (preferably in Google-expected format, but
>> acceptably in an itemized form). This way we could cherry-pick seven
>> days before the deadline and get more sleep during that week. :)
>>
> Excellent idea.
>
> The ideas page could  be even richer in information. For instance, it
> could have stuff about the project, personal info about the mentors,
> etcetera. For reference, here are the links to two ideas pages that
> were highly praised during the chat:
> (first one is Sage an algebra system, the second opne is the Semantic
> Media Wiki)
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1v91UmkDvgEInzPFT_g0osid5g69oKKmyx0NclwcyqI4&pli=1
>
> http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/GSoC_2011
>
> The few lines in yellow at the beginning of the Sage Ideas page were
> actually added after the chat and reflect Carol's suggestions.
> and here is one that was criticized as being too skimpy:
>
> http://jmonkeyengine.org/gsoc-2011/ideas-page/
>
> Cheers,
>
> S.
>
>
>
>
>> Let me know if you have different ideas. Cheers
>> Liviu
>>
>

Reply via email to