On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:15:01AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > Well, I disagree on both the move to 22x22 standard size and the new > proposed icons. As it seems everyone else is fine with both issues, I will > arrange to have my personal copy with 20x20 icons whose look is as in the > attached image (obtained with a patch setting normalIconSize = 20). > So, I don't think I can contribute to this aspect as I already did my own > personal fork :)
Thinking a bit more about it, maybe the code could be arranged such that to not have hardcoded the normal size. Say we look at the size of a particular icon and then set normalIconSize according to its size. In this way, an icon set can also decide what the normal size is and maybe everyone is happy... -- Enrico
