On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 08:06:37PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 29.01.2011 um 19:12 schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > > > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 05:52:08PM +0100, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > > > >> Il 29/01/2011 17:13, Tommaso Cucinotta ha scritto: > >>> > >>>> I can also share my template-based one, that avoids code replication > >>>> and actually turns this burden over the odocstream class itself. > >>>> Assuming > >>>> the latter works fine on all architectures, this one should as well :-). > >>> > >>> Forgot to attach. > >> > >> just don't even try it: my own brand new automated tests just started > >> to fail because, with that template-ish thing, at the first attempt of > >> typing a character in text-mode LyX was asserting :-). > >> > >> I'm using the Enrico's patch that works fine (at least on my 64-bit > >> machine). > > > > Yet, I think your idea is right for avoiding code duplication. Let's see > > whether requiring explicit instantiations works. If yes, adding a > > forgotten type would only require adding a single-line instantiation > > declaration. > > > > So, does the attach patch work for you? > > This patch works here too (32 bit on Mac).
Committed, then. -- Enrico
