Patrick Atamaniuk wrote:
> - Changes to po files are not included in this patch.
you dont need to care, they are made automatically later.
> Index: lib/layouts/fix-cm.module
> ===================================================================
> --- lib/layouts/fix-cm.module (revision 0)
> +++ lib/layouts/fix-cm.module (revision 0)
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +#\DeclareLyXModule{Fix cm}
> +#DescriptionBegin
> +#Loads the LaTeX package fix-cm which changes the font definitions of the
> +#Computer Modern fonts, in order to achieve the following effects:
> +#The appearance of the T1 and TS1 encoded CM fonts (aka `EC') is made as
> similar
> +#as possible to the traditional (OT1 encoded) ones. Particularly, a
> +#number of broken or ugly design sizes are no longer used, the look of the
> bold
> +#sans serif typeface at large sizes is considerably improved, and mismatches
> +#between the text fonts and the corresponding math fonts are avoided.
> +#The Computer Modern fonts are made available with arbitrary sizes.
> +#Only those design sizes of the fonts will be used, that are normally
> available
> +#in Type1 format, too.
> +#DescriptionEnd
as a translator i feel that this paragraph should be considerably smaller :)
point out only the most important points. the rest can be put into the manuals,
with some note here, like "for details see users guide" or where the modules are
documented...
> Index: lib/Makefile.am
> ===================================================================
> --- lib/Makefile.am (revision 37304)
> +++ lib/Makefile.am (working copy)
> @@ -1095,6 +1095,7 @@
> layouts/extreport.layout \
> layouts/figs-within-sections.module \
> layouts/fixltx2e.module \
> + layouts/fix-cm.module \
> layouts/foils.layout \
> layouts/foottoend.module \
> layouts/frletter.layout \
we usually care also for scons, development/scons/scons_manifest.py
Richard Heck wrote:
> There's something about how patches are attached that makes them show up
> inline when you reply, but I can't remember how this gets configured.
thats defined in attachment type. text/plain usually works. in fact
my mutt was ok even with this text/x-patch... one can try .patch or .txt
file name, some mail client will setup it then.
> That said, I don't see any reason to comment on this one. It's perfectly
> fine, so far as I can see, and I see no reason not to include it in 2.0.
> Pavel?
still not in rc, so ok. it was Georg's request so i suppose has he will care
about this patch.
but please Patrick, look rather on the bugs with 2.0 milestone. these are
most urgent pain now...
also send GPL statement (look on Jim's mail from yesterday), i'll add you
to the credits later.
pavel
