On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:57:04AM +0100, lasgout...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: lasgouttes
> Date: Tue Jan 18 10:57:03 2011
> New Revision: 37245
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/37245
> 
> Log:
> Rename --enable-profiling to --enable-gprof to pave the way for a configure 
> option for normal profiling
> 
> Modified:
>    lyx-devel/trunk/INSTALL
>    lyx-devel/trunk/config/lyxinclude.m4
> 
> Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/INSTALL
> ==============================================================================
> --- lyx-devel/trunk/INSTALL   Mon Jan 17 22:49:28 2011        (r37244)
> +++ lyx-devel/trunk/INSTALL   Tue Jan 18 10:57:03 2011        (r37245)
> @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@
>  
>  The following options allow to tweak more precisely the generated code:
>  
> -  o --enable-profiling instruments the code for use with the gprof
> +  o --enable-gprof instruments the code for use with the gprof
>      profiler. The result are only meaningful in conjunction with
>      --enable-build-type=release.

Does gprof support still makes much sense in the times of valgrind/callgrind?

Andre'

Reply via email to