On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:57:04AM +0100, lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: > Author: lasgouttes > Date: Tue Jan 18 10:57:03 2011 > New Revision: 37245 > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/37245 > > Log: > Rename --enable-profiling to --enable-gprof to pave the way for a configure > option for normal profiling > > Modified: > lyx-devel/trunk/INSTALL > lyx-devel/trunk/config/lyxinclude.m4 > > Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/INSTALL > ============================================================================== > --- lyx-devel/trunk/INSTALL Mon Jan 17 22:49:28 2011 (r37244) > +++ lyx-devel/trunk/INSTALL Tue Jan 18 10:57:03 2011 (r37245) > @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ > > The following options allow to tweak more precisely the generated code: > > - o --enable-profiling instruments the code for use with the gprof > + o --enable-gprof instruments the code for use with the gprof > profiler. The result are only meaningful in conjunction with > --enable-build-type=release.
Does gprof support still makes much sense in the times of valgrind/callgrind? Andre'