Am 09.12.2010 um 12:38 schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 07:58:45AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am 09.12.2010 um 02:04 schrieb Enrico Forestieri: >> >>> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 11:52:10PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: >>>> >>>> I don't know if there are any drawbacks - it works! >>> >>> It may have drawbacks. >>> For example, are you able to paste between different LyX instances? >> >> No. If I copy in instance A and paste into B - command disabled. >> Copy in B and paste into A - first (unrelated) copy is pasted. >> That's to be expected. >> >> The ways to get 2 instances are: >> * start two different versions of LyX (beta1 and beta2) >> * start from terminal again >> * start from Application and start from debugger >> >> I'm not sure how to rate the patch. >> Somehow it does not look 100% correct. > > Only pasting beween different LyX instances is not possible, though. > >> Shouldn't it possible to get more infos about the selection from Qt? >> It would help - as I see it - if one can decide if the current >> selection is owned by the same instance of LyX or not. > > I tackled the problem in a different way. Please test the attached patch. > It should be possible pasting between different LyX instances even on > Mac and, at the same time, avoid the absolute path bug when pasting > in the same LyX instance. Note that when pasting between different LyX > instances, an absolute path is always used. This is so also on *nix and > Windows. Moreover, on *nix and Windows no change of behavior is entailed. > Please, test it thoroughly.
I can confirm - it works, at least partly. The internal copy has relative path and the inter-instance copy has absolute path. But copying text from terminal window to LyX isn't possible anymore after I copied an image. Succeeding pastes insert the image again. Stephan
