On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 11:42:03AM +0100, veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote: > > the movement shouldn't be as big as in normal traffic - but right - thats > > possible... and its what we want - to focus on bugs and not on new features. > > It's right. I'll take a look at the ticket list if I can help in something. > Another thing: why 2.1? It's a change so big that wouldn't fit in 2.0.1?
I think Pavel meant 2.0.1, as it doesn't entail a file format change, I think. You know, even the most apparently innocent change right before a release could introduce regressions. > > You should now know how it works: If you really want it, you propose a > > patch and it will be thoughtfully considered :) > > Well ;) It was just to know your opinion and if there's some serious reason > why > the output wasn't redirected to stdout. Unless the output is captured for processing (and even in that case, I would say) it *should* be shown on the terminal, IMHO. So, if it is not, that's an oversight, most probably. -- Enrico
