>>>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> The code ensures that each RGB entry is unique. No more.
Is it actually needed?
Angus> The black, white stuff was purely an add on so that "black" and
Angus> "white" appeared at the top of the list. No real reason for it.
Angus> If I keep this, then a better test would be on the RGB values
Angus> themselves, rather than the (arbitrary) name.
Except, that you will not know what is the 'meaningful' string to keep
and the one to suppress. I think it is too much trouble for a dubious
gain (the list is so long anyway).
JMarc
