On 08/09/2010 05:24 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 9 août 10 à 23:15, Richard Heck a écrit :
http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Vinay_Deolalikar/Papers/pnp12pt.pdf
Like with Wiles, we have to wait until we knows what holes are in there
and how easy it is to fix them.
Yes, things could fall apart, but I gather people think it's good so far.
(Wiles's original proof, of course, fell completely apart. Lucky for
him, there was a fix, though not at all easy.)
PS: and BTW P is NOT equal to NP!
I should have said: The question whether P = NP has been answered.
rh
