Liviu Andronic wrote: > Why not simply: 'missing latex classes' because there's also DocBook and it could also be missing style files.
> or 'missing dependencies'? this is a bit vague, IMHO. Jürgen
Liviu Andronic wrote: > Why not simply: 'missing latex classes' because there's also DocBook and it could also be missing style files.
> or 'missing dependencies'? this is a bit vague, IMHO. Jürgen