Richard Heck wrote: > > So this is kind of an old one, but a good one; meant to do it before the > list crashes and then didn't have time. But the recent report about a > missing TOC update following changes to note types reminded me why we need > this. So here it is for any comment. I'll commit shortly if there is no > objection. OK, Pavel? We'll want time to test it....
go for it. pavel
