On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn <v...@lyx.org> wrote:
> Op 8-5-2010 13:01, John McCabe-Dansted schreef:
>>
>> If a patch isn't commented on in a couple of weeks, shall I resend?
>> For now, I will do so.
>>
>
> Yes, that's good. Just remind us. There are so many issues, questions, bugs,
> new features and other problems that ask for attention that we forget some
> things or two.
>
> But, the patch is still in my tree, and I put it again on the todo-list a
> few days again.
>
> It would be nice if I could reproduce the problem you're fixing. But, as far
> as I remember, the patch was pretty reasonable anyway.

I have been able to reproduce this on e.g. Ubuntu 9.10 and FC10.

The only reason I can think of that you might not be able reproduce
this is that some applications don't actually pause when you hit
Ctrl-Z. E.g. with gedit, if gedit is already running then running
gedit again will just send a message to the existing gedit process to
open a new tab and so pressing Ctrl-Z on the terminal won't freeze the
main process.

Here is the precise process I use to reproduce bug 6597

0) Notice that LyX normally takes a couple of seconds to start
1) Open a terminal
2) Make sure gedit isn't running
3) Type "gedit"
4) In Gedit type "asdf"
5) Copy the "asdf" text you just typed
6) Make sure you *can* paste the asdf text you just typed.
7) Go to the terminal and press Ctrl-Z, stopping gedit.
8) Make sure you *cannot* paste asdf
9) Run lyx (branch will do)
10) Notice that LyX now takes over a minute to start up.
11) Notice that LyX requires over a minute to display the "Edit" menu.

Does this sequence reproduce the bug for you? If not is it step (8) or
(10/11) that you cannot reproduce?

-- 
John C. McCabe-Dansted

Reply via email to