Yann MORERE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| > I have to admit that I did not look too closely to your error messages, so
| > maybe the sugesstion is complete nonsense...
| 
| no, i don't think, so, your remark seems to be good.

This might work: confiugre lyx with --with-inluded-string, that will
make the mangled name of a lot of functions be a lot a shorter.

        Lgb

Reply via email to