rgheck <rgh...@...> writes: > > Here's a patch updated to current trunk, since I incremented the format > for another reason. > > There are a couple conceptual issues. > > (1) refstyle does not know about theorems and lemmas by default. What > mechanism should we use for declaring the reference styles?
Seems to me that this should be fixed upstream, in the refstyle package. > [...] > > (2) Part of the attraction of refstyle is that it doesn't have to use > ":" as a separator, which is bad in French, since the colon is active. > Should we just use something else? If so, what? Should we allow it to be > customized? The disadvantage in either case is that refstyle by default > assumes ":", and so either we or the user has to take appropriate steps > to tell refstyle about the difference. Unfortunately, there is no easy > way to do that. It has to be done for each and every reference style you > declare. > What are other advantages of refstyle versus prettyref? I will give your patch a try, but I kind of like prettyref. I sure hope I can produce the same kind of output, otherwise I would prefer to keep prettyref support next to it. > rh > Cheers, Julien
