On 03/05/2010 11:56 AM, Edwin Leuven wrote:
now when looping i write something like this:row_type const nrows = row_info.size(); for (row_type r = 0; r < nrows; ++r) { are compilers these days smart enough so that we can simply write: for (row_type r = 0; r < row_info.size(); ++r) {
I guess it depends of the constness of row_info... Best is to not bet on the compiler smartness :-) Abdel.
