Uwe Stöhr schreef:
Am 17.01.2010 01:17, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Why not CELL_NORMAL, CELL_BEGIN_OF_MULTI, CELL_END_OF_MULTI.. these are
exclusive anyway.
It is unnecessary to determine also the end. Begin and part cells is
enough information, no?.
sorry I meant PART in stead of END. I just doubted whether it isn't ok
to just have the three you have now, both for columns as rows.
What doesn't work ? You should at least have some code somewhere else
using this new enum, for painting on screen and latex output.
It should, but in the latex output routine, the recognition of the
multirow part cells fail.
How do you recognize them ?
No, this line is stolen from
Tabular::setMultiColumn(idx_type cell, idx_type number)
Yes, I know.
I guess that if you select three cells to become one, this line glues
all the content of the three cells together and puts this in your new
multirow cell.
This seems to be my thinko - I cannot use this routine to merge
multirows. I'll have a closer look on this issue.
Why not ?
If I'm still sticking afterwards. I would like to post what I have at
the moment hoping that you see my mistake.
You can of course always post it.
Vincent
