Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
I made the function static now, so it feels pretty much private. Do
you still want the camelbump style ?
Personally yes, private is no exception.
For some reason I thought that private functions shouldn't be
camelBumpStyled, but that was a mistake apparently.
the coding style is pretty consistent accross lyx source code
mmm... I could fill days correcting the style :p..
I know but no reason to add more inconsistance.
and yours hurt my eyes
I sort of liked it :P, but I corrected it.
Thanks.
Abdel
