"Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW" <v.f.vanraveste...@tudelft.nl> writes: > So, why are we discussing it then .. Because we need it ? > > Isn't the use of cur.dispatched(), cur.undispatched(), > cur.result().dispatched() basically a work-around for missing the > DispatchResult which only works in places where there is a Cursor > available ? > > If so, then it has been needed already in a lot of places.
I would not be opposed to systematic use of DispatchResult in FuncRequest. The part with Cursor is Andre's doing, but I do not rememeber what the reasoning was at the time. JMarc
