It would be, If I could insert ERT *inside* math mode, like
$\frac{\sqrt{ <put my diagrams or inset or ERT or somethig here..> }}{6}
\\A lot more math,,$
I can put all my math as ERT. But I can also write all my document in plain
LaTeX...
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org> wrote:
> Ronen Abravanel wrote:
> > One of the fun thing about this package, is that it's enable you to add
> your
> > diagrams as part of an equation. So, if I want to write, like
> > \frac{Diagram...}{Other Diagram} + ... and stuff, It will be much more
> > continent In math-mode.
>
> i still dont understand why ERT is not enough for your inset1?
>
> pavel
>
> > Your solution seems convenient for my "2nd stage" -- Yo use instant
> preview
> > instead of replacing fonts. But the "name-changed text inset" can not be
> > too complicated, as it works just fine with
> > "\renewcommand{\text}{\Feyn}"
> > Aside of the fact it disable my "\text" inset..
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Ronen Abravanel wrote:
> > > > I'll start adding the support in my local copy of lyx, and
> afterwards, if
> > > it
> > > > will be good enough, I'll be glad to contribute it to lyx.
> > >
> > > i dont want to sound too pesimistic, but your project looks quite
> > > ambitious,
> > > which usually ends up somewhere in the void... :) i haven't worked with
> > > feyn
> > > package, but wouldn't be ERT + instant preview for this ERT enough? not
> to
> > > mention
> > > that stepping into implementation of this would solve support for many
> > > other
> > > packages in one step.
> > >
> > > pavel
> > >
>
