Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > this number is max changes done, right? if so i would make bigger > > if waiting time is not much (or set it up, so the current processors > > doesn't wait more then - say - 5sec?) > > I will experiment, but it seemed to me that my original 10000 value was > too large. O course, this is just a stopgap measure and what we need is > a way to interrupt the process, but I ran out of easy ideas on this.
we notice user that we stopped it, thats fine enough. > >> * for each inset, lyx::dispatch is invoked with the cursor in front of > >> the inset. An alternative would be to invoke inset->dispatch. These > >> two alternatives allow for different applications... What shall I do? > > > > could you be more verbose how does it differ from users pov? > > One can only execute functions that are available when the cursor is in > front of the inset. For example, one cannot change the type of a note, I > think, because the inset at point never sees the request (that it would > see with a context menu). hmm, but this type-change was one of the motivations for inset-change, wasn't it? pavel
