On 09/04/2009 07:08 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
rgheck ha scritto:
Exactly what I was needing, thanks. I also found out that
boost/xpressive has a support for that, just checking if it works.
Does not even compile on my system :-(. Should I expect any difference
if trying with included boost ?
There have been some issues with included boost recently. I think the
fatal combination is gcc 4.4, x86_64, and --enable-stdlib-debug. So I've
had to go --without-included-boost for a while. But I'm not expert on
the compilation, make, etc stuff.
No, but the big advantage to boost, obviously, is that we already
depend upon it. I don't even know how well PCRE works cross-platform.
Obviously, we'd have to add it to our own tree....
I see... If I understand well, it should constitute the "runtime" of
Perl (but I may have misunderstood), so I would expect a wide
availability.
Yes, but it would lead to packaging dependencies and the like that our
Windows packages, e.g., might not care for. Rhe PCRE website says the
Windows port is provided by GnuWin32 and itself has some dependencies.
rh
