Alex Fernandez wrote:
> I think that requesting such a feature is wrapping the bandage before
> you get the cut: nobody has asked for it and it is likely it will
> never be a problem anyway. Why not create different HTML converters
> and see if it is actually a problem. In that case, just undo the patch
> and you are ready to go. I will try to get something going, although
> with my high level of ignorance it may take a while. And then you can
> reject it.
As Jean-Marc has outlined: what we need is a general solution. I've actually
started some work on this in trunk, but I do not have time now to finish it at
the moment (I hope to get it ready for 1.7). In any case, I think html{1-n} is
conceptually wrong.
Jürgen
