>> >> Anyway, I propose to commit the attached and see what happens. > >It looks very good, especially since adding an empty >setBuffer does not remove the buffer_ member which is >inherited...
Adding ? >Please apply, and change the assertion from >+ LASSERT(cur.buffer() == &buffer(), return); >to >+ LASSERT(cur.buffer() == buffer_, return); >because buffer() has an assertion of its own. So, if they are both 0, we are completely happy ? >Jmarc Vincent
