Richard Heck wrote: >> is there some reason we treat softlinks to files as the same files? >> i have this setup: >> 0) master including 1,2,3 >> 1) a/1.lyx >> 2) b/1.lyx >> 3) c/1.lyx >> >> where 2 and 3 is symlinked to 1. >> i want that 2 and 3 both have different local pictures and different >> insetinfo buffer-path, however lyx treat 2 and 3 as identical to 1 either >> when trying to edit them separately from master include contex menu or >> when typeseting via latex - i get three times a/1.lyx . >> >> would it cause some problems to distinguish between symlinks? >> >> > We used to do so, and it did cause bugs.
aha. > see why you might want to do what you describe. Perhaps in that case we > should only allow these buffers to be opened read-only? very good idea. should i bugzilla it? pavel
